Talk:Nil Battey Sannata
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Dharmadhyaksha in topic GA Review
![]() | Nil Battey Sannata is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 31, 2024. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Nil Battey Sannata/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dharmadhyaksha (talk · contribs) 11:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
That's one pleasing new movie I happened to see in ages and would be great reviewing it. I will make minor changes myself and put major comments in here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the film's simply a delight. Looking forward to your comments. NumerounovedantTalk 12:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
One non-free image with rationale is good, other three images from Commons are also properly licensed. But these three images are missing WP:ALTfilmcentric.wordpress.com is not WP:RSRefs 3, 5 and 7 do not have date or publisher or such things.The "Tamil Remake" section is undue. It can sit within "reception" by cutting down unnecessary details of schedule.Soundtrack infobox is useless, remove it.Use|all_music=
when musician is same for all songs.Use|total_length=
too.Use "Rohan and Vinayak" and not "Rohan & Vinayak", unless "Rohan & Vinayak" is their proper name of team or such.Soundtrack's reception is missing.
Will ping you once the comments have been addressed. NumerounovedantTalk 18:15, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: All done. NumerounovedantTalk 16:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: Also, I forgot to mention I think that the remake section is perfectly fine and doesn't have any unnecessary details as such and would not really belong in the "Reception" section. NumerounovedantTalk 15:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- One sentence; the film is remade and is under production as blah blah with blah blah in blah blah roles; that's all is needed and is relevant to this article.
- @Dharmadhyaksha: Also, I forgot to mention I think that the remake section is perfectly fine and doesn't have any unnecessary details as such and would not really belong in the "Reception" section. NumerounovedantTalk 15:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
publisher of ref 3 missingthereviewmonk.com, how is this RS?
- @Dharmadhyaksha:Fixed all. NumerounovedantTalk 11:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: Do you any more comments? NumerounovedantTalk 15:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: A little reminder. `NumerounovedantTalk 04:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha: Do you any more comments? NumerounovedantTalk 15:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Amma Kanakku is now nowhere mentioned by name except lead. Also, I just noticed that Amma Kanakku has already released. So adding a line about how it fared is needed. Your initial prose of the related section gave impression that it is still under production.Fixed this myself. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)"English: Nil Divided by Silence" has no reference. And so does "Uttar Pradesh slang for "Good For Nothing"".What is "The New Classmate"? Was it released under that name in other countries? Not mentioned anywhere except lead and no ref for that.Instead of "matriculation year" SSC can be used as we have a dedicated article to it."Troubled by her daughter's rebellious attitude" Rebellious? I must have forgotten some bits of the film, but what was rebellious in her?Wikilink "District Commissioner" to District collector."and the duo finishes their matriculation" --> "and the duo finish their matriculation""For a year, Nitesh and I worked on the script along with screenwriters". This is no exceptional statement to be quoted. It can be paraphrased.The fact that the film was distributed by Eros International finds no mention other than lead.The article gives no time frames on production of the film. Please check if that can be added.
- @Dharmadhyaksha:Fixed all. NumerounovedantTalk 10:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- The six good article criteria checks
- 1a - Done
- 1b - Done
- 2a - Done
- 2b - Done
- 2c - Done
- 2d - Done
- 3a - Done
- 3b - Done
- 4 - Done
- 5 - Done
- 6a - Done
- 6b - Done
After minor copyeditings and corrections I think this this now can be a GA. Congratulations! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)