Talk:Nikkō Shōnin

Latest comment: 4 years ago by PeepleLikeYou in topic The Article is biased

Dai-Gohonzon

edit

I removed the part saying Nikko protected the Dai-Gohonzon. There was no citation given, it was written as fact, and the Dai-Gohonzon is disputed. Steve (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've added some info on Nikko's early life, and broken the article down into sections. Steve (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nikko Shonin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Article is biased

edit

This article is heavely if not completely biased by Nichiren Shoshu views. It is important to note that Nikko is not the founder of Nichiren Shoshu only but also of two other separate schools of Nichiren Buddhism and of the Nikko linages within Nichiren Shu. The whole article should be rewritten to be more objective and accurate towards historical facts. Gonzalopena25 (talk) 04:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

There aren't a lot of people working on these articles, and there are some obvious problems with lack of expertise and non-native English with the existing texts. Perhaps there is less of a problem with bias than there is with just a lack of people volunteering to do this work. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 23:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why omit the kanji for shonin?

edit

In the text the title 上人 is omitted from the Japanese text for some reason, won't this confuse people? PeepleLikeYou (talk) 12:32, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please at least write correct English

edit

Regarding this edit conflict:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikk%C5%8D_Sh%C5%8Dnin&curid=526131&diff=925932705&oldid=925903284

I don't offer an opinion on which version is better factually, but could you please at least write correct English?

Thanks. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nobody else seems to care about this so I've reverted to the last version to be written in grammatical English. PeepleLikeYou (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply