Talk:Night Visions

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Regarding tracklist edit

The 2013 issue is not available on the US, therefore the Deluxe Edition for North America belongs on 2012! Also, for the 2013 issue Fallen is ONLY available on iTunes, and on the 2012 North American Deluxe Edition, Working Man and Fallen suffer the same. Please, whoever is undoing that, stop.

Producer and writers? edit

Why is this like the only album that has the writers and the producers? The writers are the band on every song, and no one cares about the producers enough to have them as a subcatagory on each song. If people really cared, they would look at the credits on the CD. This seems like a pat on the back to Alex da Kid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.234.69.122 (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Trololol? This is an encyclopedia. Production information on a piece of art is relevant information. 173.67.255.21 (talk) 02:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please show one other album right now with this information. No other album in their genre right now has this info, and what the h is trololol?? 24.234.69.122 (talk) 00:11, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Night Visions (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Critical reception edit

Would it be fair to say something along the lines of 'Despite several positively reviewed tracks, usch as Radioactive, Demons, It's Time, On Top of the World, Amsterdam, and Hear Me, Night Visions overall received mixed reviews.' ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjvollert (talkcontribs) 19:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Alternative! edit

Night Visions is an album with Alternative Rock as a genre. Just look at the genres of their singles! Come On, we need to add this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clawraich (Dalek) (talkcontribs) 14:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

You're not a music critic. 123.136.107.24 (talk) 02:12, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

I agree with you on that, but I'm not going to put alternative rock in there because I know it will get reverted even if I provide a source. Campingfreak3599 (talk) 04:01, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Night Visions (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Night Visions (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 7 October 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We have consensus that the album is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC among subjects with coverage. The most compelling point of the opposing arguments is the fact that the visions of Zechariah are more significant, however, little evidence was presented that this subject is typically referred to under the title "Night visions". Cúchullain t/c 04:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply



– Over four years after its release, it still receives more views than all the other topics combined.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 15:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Google Books have nothing to do with this... Unreal7 (talk) 15:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Reliable real world sources have nothing to do with the second half of the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC guideline? If real world sources don't help with the second half of the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC guideline then what do you propose as an alternative? Newspapers? In ictu oculi (talk) 11:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
How about common sense? Unreal7 (talk) 11:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom. Page views are clear. Calidum ¤ 14:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Note that the above editor deleted another editor's Talk page contributions quoting the guidelines. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Copy and pasting texts from a guideline page is not a "contribution" but rather a waste of space that clutters up the page, like some editors I know. Calidum ¤ 12:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
All the same @Calidum: you don't get to delete, reformat or blank Talk page comments in the middle of an RM, RFC. If half a guideline is being ignored or misread by some editors it is legitimate to restate it. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support as obvious primary topic. Cavarrone 11:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Night Visions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

It's Time edit

The date that It's Time was released was wrong, it was released around a year before it said.So I changed it.