Talk:Nigel Cawthorne
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
There is a first-person reference in this: "my own". I have been through and italicised all titles (only half were italicised for some bizarre reason). Note, too, a title that has "911" in it. Should this be "9/11"? Ajarmitage (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
If all the books are going to be listed, at least do a biblio as on other authors pages. And cite some sources. P.Mk (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC).
Criticism section edit
Cawthorne has complained about the criticism section and while we don't censor things, it was written in a highly sensationalistic manner and backed up with poor sourcing. It was pretty much WP:OR as it was written. If anyone wants to make a new section you will have to properly source any claims (ie, enough to show that it warrants inclusion) and write it in a neutral, factual manner. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Novelist edit
Hawthorne is listed as a c20 and c21 English novelist, but all the titles listed seem to be non-fiction. Should he be removed from these categories?
JamesHumphreys1967 (talk) 23:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)