Caps edit

Why has Niello and Nielloware been given a cpital letter? Rich Farmbrough 21:15 14 April 2006 (UTC).

History edit

wasn't niello used in late roman fibulae? just asking, because i saw some like that... 193.225.190.218 (talk) 10:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Niello. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Refs not used edit

By Robert Elgood] Johnbod (talk) 14:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Topic Indexing edit

Does this belong in the jewelry, silver, and other index boxes? Patron Vectras (talk) 15:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Garbled caption: helmet from Crimea edit

The caption to the photograph of a "helmet from Crimea or South Russia" seems garbled. I don't know enough about it to hazard a correction. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

“Statistical considerations”: absurd section heading edit

The section actually seems more historical and etymological, but perhaps it is a symptom of greater structural problems. PJTraill (talk) 09:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply