Talk:Nico Rosberg/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 11:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures edit

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

  • Is it worth mentioning why Team Rosberg is a thing?
  • 2016 championship is duplink

General edit

  • 2015 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, Lewis Hamilton, Abu Dhabi, Bahrain Grand Prix and some other duplinks
  • no copyvio found
  • He graduated with an average grade of 1.2 in 2002. - might need a little context...
  • Rosberg raced for TeamMBM.com (Mercedes-Benz McLaren) for the 2000 season. - weird seaofblue here. Why is there a team name and also constructors?
  • Rosberg was paid £500,000 by Williams[42] and was the first son of a former world champion to race in Formula One since Damon Hill in the 1999 championship.[59] - not a fan of the mid sentence refs
  • points is linked too, late, should be at: "At the season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix, Rosberg scored his first career points with a seventh-place finish."
  • Could we move the first image in 2013–2016 to the right? The see also template looks a bit weird to me.
  • Could we add another subsection to 2013–2016? Perhaps 2013-15 and 2016, as that's the most important for this article.
  • To win the Drivers' Championship, Rosberg needed finish in the first three places regardless of whether Hamilton was first or second. - probably needs a better wording

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments edit

  • Automated note - If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definitely not mandatory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)
    • I'm going to pass this one, there's a few comments above; but nothing to stop a progression. Well done. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 12:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply