Talk:Nick Grimshaw
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nick Grimshaw article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Nick Grimshaw (radio show) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 September 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Nick Grimshaw. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Early life
editSeriously? A 28-year-old has an 'early life' section? When's the lifetime achievement award?
Florence Welch
editthere is uttler no evidence that he said him and florence welch are in a relationship, its totally fabricated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.131.197 (talk) 07:14, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Is this person notable?
editThere seems to be a significant lack of consequential information. Macphysto (talk) 15:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- The significant lack of significant information makes this into a fan page unfortunately, the jury's out on noteworthiness, and there's not much wide ranging background biog sources. Violetbeau (talk) 22:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- The fan in question can't even be much of a fan, as no case is made for this person's noteworthiness. Macphysto (talk) 11:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- I would say he is notable, he has a definite history in music broadcasting. 86.157.55.98 (talk) 22:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I really don't feel he is notable, he is a radio presenter not a musician and not well known by the public 77.97.141.75 (talk) 21:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 22 September 2012
editIn a five-minute interview with Matthew Stadlen on bbc.co.uk, Nick Grimshaw said he studied Media and Business Studies at Liverpool, and did not get a first:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19668750 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.137.174 (talk) 10:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 30 October 2012
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The peronal life section only mentions that nick grimshaw is gay. this is uncited and seemingly irrrelevant in the article. please can someone either flesh out the personal life section a little bit, or preferably remove it altogether until it is properly cited and relevant to the article.
Edit: I believe that again, this area of the article does not contain enough content to make it a proper section of this article. Could we at least place a "This is a stub" notice? ∫ A Y™
I edit old style
00:32, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
146.90.184.65 (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Done. I interpret your comment as a good-faith challenge to uncited, contentious information about a living person, and have therefore removed that entire section. I have no prejudice against re-adding that information if and only if it is cited to a reliable source reference. Thank you for helping to improve Wikipedia! —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:14, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not done:
{{edit semi-protected}}
is not required for edits to semi-protected, unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages.. RudolfRed (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Inappropriate photo
editIn the infobox, we have Nick Grimshaw with certain "fan". Since the fan has nothing to do with the subject, she doesn't belong there. Can't we have a photo where he Grimshaw appears separately without a fan getting a "free ride" on top of a Wikipedia page? An infobox photo should be preferably about "the" subject and the subject alone. Frankly, in case of no other photo existing in Wikimedia, I'd much prefer a photoless infobox. We have his face in the lower box anyway. werldwayd (talk) 09:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 09:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
His sexuality in the lead section
editI don't think details of personal life should be included in the lead section because it's not why he's notable. It was restored with the edit summary "timing is relevant" but I'm not sure if that's implying that he got the Breakfast Show because he came out (I can't think of any other reason why the timing would be relevant). The main article text certainly makes no reference to the timing of any of it, so I still think it should be removed from the lead. AnemoneProjectors 21:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
In fact, MOS:BLPLEAD says not to include sexuality. anemoneprojectors 09:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Car crash
editGotta be worth a mention.
Really going out of his way to avoid pussy!
Italic title
editDoes anyone else the title in italics? I don't know why...can't find any {{Italic title}} or {{DISPLAYTITLE}} in the article. --Biscuit-in-Chief (Talk – Contribs) 18:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of date Project Home information
editIn the filmography section it says that Project Home is an upcoming 2023 series. It's now 2024. The information is out of date. (Fran Bosh (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC))