Talk:Nick Cook (writer)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 185.3.100.42 in topic Contact details

Unsourced Statements

edit

The bulk of this vanity article consisted of unsourced, editorial statements. As per WP:BLP all sentences not supported by a RS citation have been deleted. BlueSalix (talk) 12:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

worthless article

edit

All the sources for the article are either self-published or self-referrential. In particular, all the biographical details are indirectly coming from Nick Cook himself. Its not at all clear why this article even exists. 12.12.144.130 (talk) 18:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Affiliation with Janes

edit

Nick Cook ceased to be an editor at Janes around 15 years ago. He has not written anything for Janes in any capacity that I'm aware of since around 2007. The article gives a very inaccurate impression of his affiliation to Janes and its publications. Its equally inaccurate to call him a journalist today.

The most accurate description of him today would be defense industry consultant with a focus on environmental and climate topics.75.17.124.178 (talk) 00:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nick Cook (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Contact details

edit

Hi, working on something here which could possibly be significant.

If my reasoning is correct CERN and others are on the cusp of discovering antigravity.

Does anyone have contact details for the writer mentioned please? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.3.100.42 (talk) 06:08, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply