Talk:Nicholas Winterton

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)


Expenses

edit

I made an edit to the expense story only to found it reverted. I hope this new attempt is more appeasing Nev1. The only remotely controversial part I would guess is that you may argue that the story doesn't warrant it's own sub-section. With the level of public interest in expenses at the moment (cf. notability) and the Times headline "Expenses row: Tory reveals all", BBC headline "Wintertons broke expenses rules" and the citation itself from the Telegraph, I would disagree. Apologies for the amateur nature of the contribution and the messy history page. 82.36.120.58 (talk) 14:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Is this picture the most relevant/appropriate available?

edit

The most prominent person in the profile picture as of 19/10/09 is not the subject but the late Ian Smith, former Prime Minister Rhodesia.

Is this the most relevant picture available? Is it even neutral and fair considering that Smith is such a controversial figure?

What about the picture http://www.dodsdata.com//Resources/epolitix/MPWebsites/Photos/m-p/Nicholas-Winterton.jpg at Winterton's website http://www.epolitix.com/mpwebsites/mpwebsitepage/mpsite/sir-nicholas-winterton/mppage/home-91/?no_cache=1 which is presumably usable?

I'm not myself familiar with the licensing issues about photos on Wikipedia. --Jmrichardson (talk) 09:40, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion in order to be treated neutrally and fairly the subject should also be a fair person. The only people in the country who believe him to be a fair person are his wife and his children who are the benefactors of his diversion and sequestration of tax payers funds.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nicholas Winterton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply