Talk:Nicholas Anthony DiMarzio

Latest comment: 11 years ago by StarryGrandma in topic Copyright violation

Sources?

edit

This article reads like a p.r. campaign brochure. This is an encyclopedia. This article needs sources. It is simply a series of unproven, undocumented and unsourced statements. 68.183.246.164 (talk) 06:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Seems OK to Me

edit

I just read through the entire article, and I see nothing PR-ish about this page. To me, it reads like a standard biography. I see no pressing need for major changes.

ChemMJW (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

The section on Bishop of Brooklyn is copied from the page on the Bishop at the Diocese website. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously - it is against the law. The material must be rewritten or it will be removed. There are better sources of information. This is a socially active bishop who has done much more than a dry bio from the diocese indicates. The two New York Times articles cited are a good place to start. StarryGrandma (talk) 04:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

apostolic visiitation to Diocese of Buffalo

edit

He has recently been appointed to that. (remains Bishop of Brooklyn)