Talk:Ngaanyatjarra

Australia: South Australia / Western Australia / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Ngaanyatjarra is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

"Gap"

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've taken out this line:

intresting note - the native title claims in this area have all left an gap of land between each others borders rather then claiming right up to the edige - ?some kind of respect for one onother?

I guess it was meant as a question for the talk page. Anyone want to clear that up? —Pengo 13:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I was a anthropologist working in the Ngaanyatjarra lands around the time of the Native Title research being done. As far as I'm aware the only 'gap' was a relatively small rectangular area between the Pilu Ngura Claim of Tjuntjuntjarra and the Ngaanyatjarra claim. The claims all went up to the WA/SA/NT border. Originally there were a number of smaller claims but in the middle of the whole process they were amalgamated into one large claim. Kiwirrkurra had already gained Native Title Recognition by that stage so it couldn't be amalgamated. Poor old Gibson Desert Nature Reserve was excluded by the High court due to previous precendts, despite it being the strongest claim in the whole area (IMHO). All the older claim boundaries were amicably negotiated and it was through wide spread urging that all the claims be joined together. Seperate claims meant separate land holding bodies for each successful claim. It would have diminished the capacity of Ngaanyatjarra Council if this occurred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.211.77 (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic