Talk:Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redirect doesn't make sense
editI was researching all sorts of oil and gas issues, and then was deep into joint operational issues. practically every oil and gas well out there has a JOA (Joint Operating Agreement)... all of the sudden I was at some Newspaper Preservation Page... WTH? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.201.146.131 (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Merger too narrow
editJoint Operating Agreements are adopted by may industries such as oil and gas. As such it should not link to a statute on newspapers. Instead the general definition and principles should be examined. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinosaur3232 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Merger Talk
editI strongly support the proposed merger. Any reason it hasn't happened yet? (Ardievu 09:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC))
- Laziness :) I performed the merger. Feel free to be bold in cases like this where it seems obvious. -- phoebe (brassratgirl) /(talk) 06:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge from Joint operating agreement
editFirst off, obviously Joint operating agreement is the larger article, so it'd make sense to merge Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 to Joint operating agreement. But I'd disagree. I think joint operating agreements, the information about them and the list of them are a subtopic to NPA.
Anyway, nonetheless, they should be merged. Jesuschex 00:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)