This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I would like to remove the following:
"In practice, Hawaii gave enormous support to the United States, which demonstrated its value as a naval base in wartime and won widespread American approval for its non-neutral behavior"
It sounds like puffery. Objections?Cutelyaware (talk) 07:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
No objections, I was about to add some sources for other parts and I thought the same thing. ZSaskia (talk) 02:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Objection: Keep this simple noncontroversial and important fact. It is not the opinion of a Wiki editor-- it is the consensus of scholars. quoting from Ralph S. Kuykendall, Hawaii: a history, from Polynesian kingdom to American State (1961) pp 188-189 When the Spanish American War broke out: "The Hawaiian government threw aside its neutrality and did all it could to aid the Americans....Honolulu became a mid-ocean stopver for the United States troops that were sent across the Pacific to follow up Dewey's victory. The American soldiers were enthusiastically welcomed and given a taste of Hawaiian hospitality." Rjensen (talk) 02:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
on the illegality of this within international lawedit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
can someone knowledgeable please include this ? thank you from the past if you see this and fulfill this humble request. 67.8.169.171 (talk) 19:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect July 4 1894 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 13#July 4 1894 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 02:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)