Talk:Newark Liberty International Airport Station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in New York City Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).

New Jersey Mid‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Whatever happened to the Continental Airlines counter at the station? Is that still being used? Wl219 09:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

"No parking lot at the station" edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This phrase probably deserves an asterisk. What you see there are fenced-off hotel and off-site airport parking lots, but it's not too hard to imagine access being easy if there were no fence and a clear path! 68.37.254.48 (talk) 04:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

"Station" per the agencies that own, operate, and use it edit

PANYNJ :Newark Liberty International Airport Station "To and From Newark". panynj.gov. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
NJT :Newark International Airport Station "Newark Airport". njtransit.com. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
Amtrak: Newark Liberty International Airport Rail Station "Newark Liberty International Airport, NJ Train Station (EWR) - Amtrak". amtrak.com. Retrieved 13 November 2015.

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (US stations) edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (US stations) clearly states that proper name should be used. Djflem (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The convention that you just cited defers to the reliable source. Looking back at numerous discussions about this, including one that is about "Should the USSTATION capitalization advice be adhered to, using reliable sources for what is an official station name?" However, and I say this very carefully, Amtrak does not have a preference to capitalize "station" in its station names. epicgenius (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Amtrak: Newark Liberty International Airport Rail Station "Newark Liberty International Airport, NJ Train Station (EWR) - Amtrak". amtrak.com. Retrieved 13 November 2015. Djflem (talk) 23:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

B or C class article? edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Per Wikipedia:Content assessment: B-class: The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.

One can say that this is true of this article, which has sufficient references cited. Thus, meets C-class, at least.Djflem (talk) 10:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic