Talk:New code of NLP

I think the article need a little clean up: "What unfolds through, as a result of John Grinder and Carmen Bostic’s continued quest to bring excellence to the field is a brilliant set of patterns (the New Code) that significantly advanced the quality of change work in NLP" sounds a bit like advertising to me.

Also I'd like to see a more concrete description of the new code, so that an unbiased reader, who is familiar with the classic code can see the advantages of the new code. (From what I read about the new code, I personally find the whole idea quite fascinating.) 80.136.118.99 (talk) 16:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

"Define: explicated" yields no results on Google. What the heck does this word mean? Can it be replaced with something more clear? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.125.81.34 (talk) 13:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I will remove the link to type theory completely, I doubt very much that readers interested in psychological classification patterns will be interested in math theory of classification as well. 10:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankipank (talk • contribs)

Mergeto NLP

All of the references are primary sources, and there are not many of them. Given this how about taking the paragraph which the material can sustain and put it into the main NLP article? --Snowded ^TALK 06:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, here is a proposed section for the merge. Could be made more brief and clear:

"New code of Neuro-linguistic programming (New code of NLP) is a revised framework for the teaching and delivery of NLP patterns. It was developed by John Grinder in the early and mid-80's. Grinder is credited as the co-founder (with Richard Bandler) of the original ("classic") NLP. Grinder has described the new code as an attempt to address several design flaws that were observed in the classic coding".

Possible source: Grinder, John & Carmen Bostic St Clair (2001.). Whispering in the Wind. CA: J & C Enterprises. Lam Kin Keung (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

I placed the above text into the main NLP article to see how it fits in context: [1]. Lam Kin Keung (talk) 01:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Looks OK to me, suggest we complete the merge --Snowded ^TALK 05:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Sure, sounds good. Lam Kin Keung (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)