Talk:New York State Route 430/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

And this one... :) Review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 21:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • Most of the route description section needs references.
   • Ref 4 (New York Law) needs a publisher and access date

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A couple of issues with references, so I am putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

All comments are resolved. Thanks!Mitch32^(UP) 21:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Everything looks good, so passing this one too. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 13:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)