Talk:New York State Route 429/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 05:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The sentence "Though relatively minor in length, NY 429 nevertheless enjoys regional importance for not only connecting North Tonawanda and some of the county's interior regions, but also for the sweeping view it offers as it descends the Niagara Escarpment near its northern end." sounds awkward. The phrase "a striking departure from the rural fields that have predominated up to Sanborn" needs to be reworded.

   Motion seconded, so ordered.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Is any historical information from after 1935 available?

   Not really. Added a note to the end of the history saying as much.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A couple of fixes and this article should be ready. Dough4872 05:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Replied above. – TMF 05:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 05:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)