Talk:New York State Route 273/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The lead needs to be expanded and rewritten. Try to include some turnpike information, as that is the most interesting part of the highway's history. As well, don't use "with" as a connecting word.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A decent article. Just needs a little work, so I put the article on hold. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Lead rewritten.Mitch32^(UP) 18:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)