Talk:New York State Pavilion

Latest comment: 20 days ago by Rollinginhisgrave in topic GA Review

A question regarding the "After the fair" Section of the Article.

edit

I remember reading somewhere that in 1970 the New York State Pavilion's Tent of Tomorrow was converted into an ice skating rink, but I can no longer find the source article. If anyone can confirm this information, it should be added to the "After the fair" section of the article.

Also, in the article in the second sentence of the third paragraph of the "After the fair" section it says:

" Once the red ceiling tiles were removed from the pavilion in the late 1970s for safety reasons, the Texaco terrazzo floor map of New York State was subject to the elements of weather and was ruined."

I have read from the following website ( http://forgotten-ny.com/2003/07/worlds-fair-remnants/ ) that the ceiling tiles were mostly orange and blue, with some red tiles in it as well. If someone could correct this fact, that would be much appreciated.

Thanks for your help, MKluge Mkluge (talk) 22:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Information that should be added to the "Restoration plans" section of the article.

edit

In the "Restoration plans" section of the article, when it talks about the restoration efforts that began in 2008, it leaves out the efforts of a group of volunteers who started repainting the New York State Pavilion's Tent of Tomorrow in 2009, a project, called the "New York State Pavilion Paint Project", which is still ongoing. The website is ( http://nyspproject.com/ ). I believe that someone should add this information to the article.

Also, I think it is worth mentioning that the $5.8 million, referenced in the first sentence of the last paragraph of the section,

( "In July 2014, the pavilion received about $5.8 million for restoration." )

will be used to install a new staircase in each of the observation towers, and to replace the concrete platforms that support each of the observation towers, as well as install a new electrical system on all three observation towers. The article that I sourced this information is at the following website ( http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/world-fair-relic-set-extensive-restoration-article-1.1847082 )

Thanks for your help, MKluge Mkluge (talk) 01:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Other uses

edit

At least one other use is missing. Around 1969 to 1971, there was a series of rock concerts held in the pavilion. I saw the Grateful Dead, Santana (one of their first NY appearances), Joe Cocker and Procol Harem there. There were probably others as well. I've added a reference to this in the main article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markssss (talkcontribs) 20:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 00:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
The New York State Pavilion
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 654 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 14:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   I prefer ALT2 as the most dramatic and interesting. All of the hooks check out so up to the promotor which to use. Article went from 1000 to 7,816 words so more than 5x expansion. Lightburst (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Pavilion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 01:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 04:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll take this one. This will be the last of your nominations I review for a few weeks to ensure variety in reviewers. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 04:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

General comments

edit

Adding content as I go.

Finished this up. Not many things noted, mainly clarifications. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, didn't see you were on holidays. No rush, have a go at it when you get back. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Rollinginhisgrave, no problem. Actually, I can take a look at these right now - I still have some internet access. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prose and contents

edit
  • Fashion firms had asked the state government for permission to stage fashion exhibits in the Tent of Tomorrow in November 1962 They wanted to use it in 1962 or asked in 1962?
  • The Tent of Tomorrow hosted concerts and fashion shows[45][46] and was one of two locations (along with the Better Living Center) where fashion shows were staged. repetition of fashion shows
  • Hundreds of civil rights activists organized a sit-in at the pavilion during the opening ceremony and were arrested. because of the underemployment of African Americans?
  • Tent of Tomorrow's decaying map Introduce the map here.
  • all of these plans were canceled due to the high cost of restoration. Did the proposals make it into the planning stage?
Should be changed from saying there were plans if they were just proposals, especially since proposals can't be "cancelled" Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 18:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • The feasibility study was completed in the late 1990s, while the rest of the pavilion continued to rot.[145] redundant that the rest of the pavilion degraded while the study was being completed. What were the conclusions?
    • I actually had another look at the source - they were still working on the study at the time. (Later sources don't explicitly mention this study, but they do mention several other proposals, such as the 2001 aviation-museum proposal that's mentioned in the article. Epicgenius (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • known during the World's Fair Block 46 as Block 46?
  • Several small planters were also placed around the map. In 2019 or originally?
  • Indiana's mural tricked some visitors into believing that the Theaterama was a restaurant, so the lights on his mural had to be turned off. could you clarify what this means?
  • The modern theater's entrance is through the "nebula" structure and this as well. Does it just mean a ring?

Suggestions

edit

Sources

edit

Spot check

1) In the years immediately after the fair, the Tent of Tomorrow hosted events such as a judo competition.  Y
2) and a local company offered to pay $6 million to renovate the tent into a roller rink.  Y
3) UCF began scanning the pavilion that June.  Y
4) Each cable measures 2.5 inches (6.4 cm) thick.  Y
5) Supposedly as retribution for the removals, Warhol created silkscreened portraits of Robert Moses, to which Johnson objected.  Y

Other

edit
  • Images appropriately tagged  Y
  • Stable  Y
  • Neutral  Y
  • COPYVIO/OR  Y
  • Broad in its coverage  Y

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. I've now addressed all the issues you brought up. Epicgenius (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just one point about plans/proposals left. I won't hold up the review and just pass it, if you can address it how you see fit when you have the time. Thanks for another easy review. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 18:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.