Talk:New York Life Building/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 21:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• History and talk clear
• Infobox good
• Images licensed well
• Earwig fine
• reliable sources, and a wide selection of coverage
• Inline citations look good
• Lead satis
• In the first sentence of the body, perhaps replace "it" with the name of the building?
  • Done
• Should 'louvered' have a wikilink?
  • Done
• bronze ornamental grills - should this be 'grilles'?
  • Done
• MSG hasn't been established as an acronym for Madison Square Garden before it's used along, could it be added next to the full name
  • Done, I guess, though the article already had the text "first Madison Square Garden (MSG)". epicgenius (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
• Should ref [57] be outside the bracket?
  • Done
• What is woolen firms?
  • Fixed
• Real giant candle?
  • An artificial one. epicgenius (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Overall

• on hold I may have missed some commas, but issues are minor. Kingsif (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
  • @Kingsif: Thanks, I have done these. epicgenius (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Thanks, pass this one, too. Kingsif (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)