Talk:New Glow/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sebbirrrr in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sebbirrrr (talk · contribs) 19:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hi there. I'll be reviewing this article as part of the current backlog drive.

Infobox edit

Lead edit

Background and compossition edit

Release and promotion edit

Reception edit

  • Refs 25 and 26 should be linked to their respective chart pages
  • "However, the album's upon-release critical reviews were mixed" → "Upon release, however, the album received mixed reviews"
  • "Jon Dolan, a critic for" → "Jon Dolan, writing for"
  • Where does Jon Dolan mention tiring or repeat listens?
    • "But unless you're the kind of person who throws your hands in the air to a salvo like, "We're riding bikes through red lights/We're bulletproof," the cuteness starts to wear thin pretty fast." 👨x🐱 (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 01:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Where does Hays Davis call the album a fun record?
    • He doesn't specifically use that word, but he explains in longer sentence that's what he thinks.
      • At the beginning, "Matt and Kim’s live shows are riotous, high-flying (literally, in Kim’s case) celebrations of pure joy, and whether or not their albums quite match the levels of that buzz, they’re exactly the right soundtrack for that experience."
      • At the end, "Otherwise, however, you can drop the needle pretty much anywhere else on the record and land right back in the party."
  • "prior Matt & Kim albums" → "Matt & Kim's previous albums"
    • Fixed
  • "past releases reviewers considered" → "past releases, which reviewers considered"
  • "crazy energy and spirit" → WP:OR
  • "[4][17][7]" → should be in increasing order
  • "a formula of brainless lyrics, sing-a-long choruses and simplicity, to the point where it lost its luster and made the material sound lazy" → this sounds like WP:OR since none of the sources at the end mention any of this
    • They do. Again, paraphrasing. Same message with different terminology. Plus, the quotes in the following sentences (which are from the same citations), support this. Additionally
      • COS: "While this blissful resistance to sophistication has always been present in Matt and Kim’s work in the past, on New Glow, they seem to have regressed even further from twee hallmarks like “Daylight” or “Let’s Go”."
      • AV Club: "The record, clocking in at less than 28 minutes, feels like it was written in 10. Nobody would ever confuse Matt And Kim's straightforward riffs with Beethoven, but they’ve been diminished to near-amateur quality, as if composed by a bored Best Buy customer wandering through the keyboards aisle. [...] Enthusiasm can make up for a lot of shortcomings in this kind of by-the-numbers mod-pop—and the duo is never wanting for spirited execution—but, on New Glow, they’ve either finally dumbed things down too much, or simply reached the end of where this rudimentary songwriting can take them."
      • Pitchfork: "From "Get It", a dance track that’s all drop and no sentiment, to "Hoodie On", a thin sartorial pride anthem for the Urban Outfitters set, every song here serves as evidence to the contrary. Even on the selfie-culture critique "World Is Ending", a rare attempt at profundity from a group that doesn’t often concern itself with deep thoughts, the lyrics feel about as considered as a homework assignment scribbled in the minutes before class."
    • "brainless" and "lazy" sound more like WP:UNDUE and they're not words you'd exactly find in a good article. I recommend replacing "brainless lyrics" with "lyrics that are not thought out well" and "lazy" with "uneventful". Sebbirrrr (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • "However, the sound and style were not without positive comments" → "Although, the sound and style were given positive comments"
  • "Mincher felt New Glow" yet you linked Davis' review at the end

Track listing edit

Credits and personnel edit

Charts edit

  • Everything is fine here

Notes edit

  • See background and composition

References edit

Outcome edit