Since Neve Dekalim was an Israeli settlement and the article concerns itself with its significance historically rather than geographic information, how does it make sense to put it under a stub of "Geography of Palestine"? Or for that matter, "Geography of Israel"? Shouldn't it be a stub of Israeli history?

Or better: historical geography and file the category under both geography and history. gidonb 22:27, 27 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

United Nations Resolutions 242 and 338, plus both UN and Geneva Convention codes and laws satet that it is illegal to transfer a nation's civillian population to occupied territory. So why do people keep deleting this information from the article when it is clearly fact and not POV. By deleting it they are in fact making this article POV.....John Miller

Israeli settlement adequately describes the legal issues of the UN resolutions. The UN resolutions do not specifically refer to Neve Dekalim. In any case, leaving that sentence in its current location is simply bad writing. The first paragraphs are usually physical descriptions and statistics of the area/city'location. If you feel that bringing the UN resolution issue into the article, then it should be developed properly in a seperate paragraph. --Shuki 15:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Settlement

edit

It must say in the first sentence that it was an Israeli settlement as that is the world view. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 11:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 November 2023

edit

"It was turned into a training camp by Hamas, which described it as a "military training camp for martyrs."[2]"

This is untrue. Looking at the GPS coordinates in Google Maps shows that the site is/was being used as the location for Al Aqsa University. Not a Hamas training camp. DaCoolZone (talk) 21:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. also see WP:OR Cannolis (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply