Talk:Nepenthes rowaniae

Carnivorous plants: Plants Mid‑importance

	Nepenthes rowaniae is within the scope of WikiProject Carnivorous plants, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to carnivorous plants. For more information, visit the project page.Carnivorous plantsWikipedia:WikiProject Carnivorous plantsTemplate:WikiProject Carnivorous plantscarnivorous plant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Nepenthes rowaniae is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Um... the spelling thing... edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If the spelling is wrong, why not correct the spelling, movethe article, and post a redirect at the incorrect spelling to here, rather than list it under the incorrect spelling and then bitch about it being consistently spelled wrong?

Further, it sems to me that regardless of the language structure of the root from which the word is derived, if the scientific community is using the other spelling constantly and consistently, then the correct spelling is 'rowanae'. After all, this is scientific nomenclature, not real latin, and that's the way the word is used.

The paragraph complaining about the spelling seems whiny and unprofessional.67.169.63.116 06:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic