Talk:Neomycin

FYI, reference number 4, the one that is supposed to be citing doctors not recommending Neomycin is now a spam link. Needs to be changed. I would but my knowledge of wiki editing ends here...as you probably can tell from this not being signed with a username or timestamp. ///Anonymous Coward —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.194.23 (talk) 05:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

The structure of neomycin I believe is wrong. The deoxystreptamine should not have an oxygen apart of its ring structure at the 2 position. Please check on it. Mc schafer (talk) 03:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Hypercholesterolemia

How does it help prevent high cholesterol??? {Pelirojopajaro (talk) 03:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)}

neomycin and (high frequency) hearing loss

the article should reflect this. there are various papers that can be cited. e.g., "Tatsuya Yamasoba MD, and Katsunori Tsukuda MD, Ototoxicity after use of neomycin eardrops is unrelated to A1555G point mutation in mitochondrial DNA" Journal of Laryngology & Otology (2004), 118:7:546-550. Ear drops containing neomycin only rarely cause ototoxicity. The authors report on three patients with a tympanic membrane perforation who developed severe ototoxicity after use of eardrops containing 0.35 per cent neomycin. Mitochondrial DNA analysis revealed that there was no A1555G point mutation in these patients. This finding indicates that application of low concentration neomycin to the middle ear can cause severe inner ear damage even in humans who are not hyper-susceptible to aminoglycosides.

i don't want to edit this article because I don't know who "owns" it and would object to having an alternative viewpoint presented. Lucky dog (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

error detected

formatting required on head of page {Sealpoint33}

I have fixed the drug box so it should be good again Tjorgensen 12.33, 02 Februrary 2013 (CET)

Still not fixed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.5.44.228 (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Framycetin

Framycetin is another name for Neomycin B (as stated on the page for neomycin) The chemistds (talk) 16:40, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

IPA?

. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.136.230.216 (talk) 14:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

No Side-Effects?

Some are major, it seems, but no mention of side-effects in this article. Is it possible to 'put in requests' for help? MyshkinIncarnate (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neomycin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090709093022/http://www.dermadoctor.com/article_Your-Medicine-Cabinet_43.html to http://www.dermadoctor.com/article_Your-Medicine-Cabinet_43.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Reorganization needed (Feb 2021)

I'm probably stating the obvious, but the article would benefit from a "re-org." My suggested structure for a revised article would be:

• History/discovery
• medical uses
• laboratory uses
• composition, biosynthesis and mechanism of action

Pdanese (talk) 04:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Go for it @Pdanese: Does it have Multiple_issues? Be bold. azwaldo (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)