Talk:Neoconservative postmodernism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Eh? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Err... I wonder if some enlightened person could edit this article and actually say in plain English what the term means? M.J.E. (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

That help any? Hyacinth (talk) 22:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pointless edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

what a pointless and idiotic article

a postmodernist that claims they are a humanist is a "neoconservative postmodernist"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vive1936 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

It is generally considered rude and inappropriate to call people and things "idiotic". See Wikipedia:No personal attacks. More pertinently, "the talk page is for discussing how to improve the article." (WP:TALK) Your comment does not provide others with assistance in improving the article or indicate how one could do so. Hyacinth (talk) 05:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

i somewhat doubt reich would respond well to being called a neo-conservative. the language is extremely loaded, and the article should probably be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.53.24.135 (talk) 01:44, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

A matter to be resolved in the courts, when and if Reich demands the deletion of John Brackett's 2008 book (it is not an article).—Jerome Kohl (talk) 04:42, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic