This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This article and Nehaj indeed cover the same topic even though the Nehaj article is supposedly on a hill that is site of the fortress. Moreover, nearly entire contents are duplicated between the two articles. Merger appears to be the only plausible solution, although I would prefer merger to Nehaj instead, where the hill and the eponymous fortress could be covered properly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:40, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Still, the hill is not really notable by itself, and there is not much to be said about it that is unrelated to the fortress. Anyway, having Nehaj Fortress as a merge target does not preclude the coverage of the hill there. GregorB (talk) 13:06, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I propose splitting the existing lead section into a lead paragraph, an "Etymology" section beginning at "the name Nehaj...", and a "History" section beginning at "It was built...". Would this suffice to fix the "lead too long" issue? U. E. Aduan (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply