Talk:Negative air ions

Review

This article offers a thorough introduction to NAIs, covering everything from their historical discovery to modern applications. The content is rich and well-organized, making it an excellent piece of popular science writing.

Strengths:

Historical Overview: Provides a history of NAI discovery and research, helping readers understand its development. Empirical Data: Cites numerous scientific studies, adding to the article's credibility. Practical Examples: Clearly explains the applications of NAIs in air purification and health promotion, making it highly practical. Suggestions for Improvement:

Language Style: The language is somewhat academic and could be adjusted to a more reader-friendly style. Latest Developments: Including the latest research developments and application examples would make the content more cutting-edge. JEREMY1117 (talk) 13:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Good job!

This article provides a comprehensive introduction to negative air ions (NAIs), covering their definition, history, generation mechanisms, types, production methods, effects, detection and evaluation methods, and main influencing factors. The content is detailed and well-organized.

Strengths:

Comprehensive Information: The article thoroughly covers various aspects of NAIs, from basic definitions to practical applications. Scientific Rigor: It cites extensive research and historical records, enhancing the article's credibility. Practical Value: It explains the specific roles of NAIs in air purification and health promotion, providing methods for detection and evaluation. Suggestions for Improvement:

Simplify Language: Some sections use complex terminology, which could be simplified for non-specialist readers. Visual Aids: Adding illustrations or charts could help readers understand complex concepts and mechanisms more intuitively. AzzurroLan (talk) 13:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Article review

I think this article covers a very interesting topic, but it is a bit difficult to follow. I did not quite understand the "Generation mechanisms" and the "Generation method" section, maybe they can be merged together to let the reader better understand the concept.

I added wikilinks throughout the entire page, since they were completely missing. Having them is particularly helpful for non-domain expert to understand the concepts.

I reorganized the "See also" section with links in alphabetical order, as indicated by the course tutors.

I also believe that the first image is not really meaningful to the covered topic and it is not understandable foreign users. Beatrice Branchini (talk) 13:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)