Talk:Neem Ka Ped

Latest comment: 16 years ago by B. Wolterding in topic Expert review

Expert review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

None of the sources found establish notability. I will redirect the article. --B. Wolterding 13:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


This review has been announced on the talk page of WikiProject India. Comments should be added on this page, below.

As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether this TV series is notable enough to have its own article. Actually there are currently no secondary sources cited, so notability is questionable. But I know hardly anything about TV in India. Could you have a look whether sources can be found?

Your opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 15:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Neem ka Ped was a TV series on Lucknow Doordarshan, but unfortunately I don't know much about it! As it was a TV series I see no harm in having an article about it. I am currently looking for sources, but Google isn't very helpful. I can't find anything on the Doordarshan website or Lucknow Doordarshan website either. These other links were all I could find on Google, and are simply interviews with actors and barely mention the name of the series once: 1 2. Will look for more, hopefully much better, sources. Shruti14 ( talkcontribs ) 19:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
UPDATE - a Wikipedia article on Rahi Masoom Raza, the person who (according to the article) wrote Neem ka Ped? Also mentions that it is a novel with the same name? Shruti14 ( talkcontribs ) 19:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your help - none of these sources establish notability, however. Wikipedia itself is not a valid secondary source for Wikipedia. But still the information is useful - I will redirect the TV series article to Rahi Masoom Raza. It can be expanded again at any time once more sources about the TV series have been found. --B. Wolterding 13:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.