Talk:Neath and Tennant Canal/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit

I've had a quick read of the article, and I believe that it should make GA-status states this time round.

I'm now working my way through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. This step is likely to day a day or so and this appears to be a comprehensive article. I may fix any "trivial problems" as I go through the article, and if so I might not list them here. Pyrotec (talk) 19:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

There was very litle that I needed to do: I added some convert templates (to satisfy the "metric poice") and a few wikilinks. Pyrotec (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Yes: with photographs taken by the Nominator.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

I'm awarding this this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an informative article, which (obviously) involved a previous site visit. Pyrotec (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply