This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why are we capping Near Eastern Archaeology off at 612CE? I think there are plenty of good reasons to include post-612 periods in this definition. For example, professional journals dedicated to publishing Near Eastern research (e.g. Levant, Palestine Exploration Fund, Near Eastern Archaeology Magazine, etc.) do not discriminate. Any thoughts? If not, I will change in a few days. Bporter615 23:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)bporter615Reply
