![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos of America, Inc.
editDoes anyone know when this case might be resolved so that Naxos' music can be available in the US again?
fringe repertoire
editOn the other hand, their selection of classical repertoire is very broad - perhaps the broadest of any existing label[citation needed] - including fringe repertoire such as the Symphonies of Nikolai Myaskovsky, much of contemporary classical music, and pieces by Johann Pachelbel other than his famous Canon in D.
This seems like a badly written passage - too colloquial, and the examples given seem to be arbitrarily chosen.
Budget?
editNot all Naxos offerings are budget, and in the latest catalogue the company president scolds those who would consider Naxos a mere "budget" label. The Arthaus DVDs, for example, are priced woefully high. I have changed the article accordingly. CRCulver 00:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- There are bad connotations of 'budget label' but the fact is, the Naxos CD range cost $8.99 each or £5.99 in the UK, which puts them safely in the 'budget range' by all definitions that I have seen.
Fair use rationale for Image:Naxos.gif
editImage:Naxos.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Largest etc.
editI have seen a similar claim in a recent BBC Music Magazine brief article, will see if I can something stronger to back this up. Schissel | Sound the Note! 15:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Donau
editIn earlier time some naxos' work are call in another recorder laber
- 'Donau', but no information on wiki about that.
other people
editIs there other information about who is behind Naxos? I heard today @ a library conf that they are growing fairly quickly, but somehow don't include public domain recordings because of bad experiences with legal fuzziness... I wonder if they or similar orgs could help get more audio clips into commons. +sj+ 02:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Etymology?
editName derived from the island of Naxos? David Spector (user/talk) 15:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
2nd to whom?
editIs it assumed that the reader of this article knows who the biggest classical music label is? I don't ... Musanim (talk) 00:49, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Largest
editThe source Michael Dougan (15 July 2002). "Classical Music: Tuning up for the 21st century". San Francisco Chronicle. never mentions Naxos. I think the sentence should be removed unless better sourcing is provided. Triplecaña (talk) 09:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Vector version logo
editVector version logo can be found in page 3 of [1].--Kcx36 (talk) 13:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)