Talk:Naval History

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Quuxplusone in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit

Naval HistoryNaval History (magazine)– The current title could be the target of a mistaken link for naval history in general. Naval history is a common term that should take the common name, and it has roughly 100 links as opposed to the magazine's 20ish. Thus the Naval history article should remain in place, Naval History (with two caps) should be a redirect to Naval history, and the article about the magazine should be Naval History (magazine). The magazine article was originally tagged for a merge, but a move is much more appropriate. - Draeco 02:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~