Talk:Natwar Singh
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cleanup edit
I've tried to format the article a bit. It needs a lot more basic information - like which constituency he represented in Lok Sabha (and whether he lost or did not contest at all in 1989 and subsequent elections, I am not sure so I marked my own sentence as disputed!) , which state he represents in the Rajya Sabha, a better description of his policies as MEA, more details on the scandal --Ravikiran 15:37, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
not sacked... edit
...In In the news section on Main Page, it is mentioned that K. Natwar Singh was sacked. He has only been stripped of his portfolio; he still remains a minister, albeit without porfolio, pending a judicial enquiry. --Gurubrahma 07:37, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite/removal edit
I've just removed a bunch of material, and rewritten other parts. It may be possible to reintroduce some of that information, but only if it is carefully sourced. WP:BLP says that we may never include negative or contentious material on living persons unless that information is covered in highly reliable sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:12, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Stop the usage of His Highnesss/ Maharaja etc for Individuals !! edit
Usage of titles like Maharaja/ His highness has been prohibited by the constitution of India by Article 18. Even the usage of Bharat Ratna or Padambhusan etc has been a bone of contention which has even led to the demand of abolition of these awards. Right to equality is among the fundamental rights of every citizens in India, Lets now use such title to create and promote differences of superiority or inferiority among Indians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raasbihari (talk • contribs) 06:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- I removed them. Please note, though, that my reason for removal had absolutely nothing to do with Indian law, which Wikipedia is in no way subject to. However, our guideline, WP:Honorific, says that we usually shouldn't use them, so I took them out. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)