Talk:Nationwide Rip Ridaz

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Spellcast in topic Song names

Tweedy Bird Loc edit

Explain to me, in what way is he a member of Nationwide Rip Ridaz? I know he was/is a member of KPCC, but he ain't no member of Nationwide Rip Ridaz as the group.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pell3 (talkcontribs) August 16, 2007

Good question. I guess Tweedy Bird Loc should be removed from the current members.--Tasco 0 14:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Song names edit

Who keeps changing "Wish You Were Here" to "Wish U Were Here"? That's not the correct name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.203.232 (talk) 10:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am. You're adding incorrect information. The correct name of the songs are like I am adding it.
Please stop. If you continue vandalizing Wikipedia I will report you.--Tasc0 01:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Where are your sources? Go Google the songs or check on Youtube. They're not "Wish U Were Here" or "Gs & Locs" just because you say so.

[1] [2]

I don't care it whether you got it from YouTube (YouTube is not a reliable source), Google Video (also another non-reliable source), etc. My source is the back cover of the album.
The only correction I'll make to my edits is the "you" instead of "U". The other song is spelled with out apostrophes.
This is my last warning I will give you. Next time I will report you. Thanks for understanding.--Tasc0 04:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

The only reason I mentioned Youtube is because the videos have the correct names in the intro, which are "G's & Loc's" and "Wish You Were Here". And unless I see a picture, I'm not gonna stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.221.177 (talk) 03:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I can't post the back cover here because it will violate the copyrights, specially with out a fair use relationale.
As you stating you will not stop, I have more than one reason to report you as a vandal and you may be blocked/banned from editing in Wikipedia. Thank you.--Tasc0 03:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The actual album would be the most reliable source, so it should be spelled the way the back cover has it. Spellcast (talk) 03:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
That's what I've been trying to say this user. But like he said, he won't stop until he sees an image of the back cover. And I already explained why I can't post it here.--Tasc0 03:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

And what I've been trying to tell you is that if you check Youtube, you will see the correct names in the beginning of the video. And honestly, do you think "Gs & Locs" without the apostrophes is correct spelling? Even for a song? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.153.237 (talkcontribs)

What the actual album says should take precedence over the video. And if it's spelled as "Gs & Locs", then the article should go with that. Also, sign your comments with 4 ~~~~. Thanks. Spellcast (talk) 07:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't have to check nothing. You go a check the back cover of the album. Besides, that video from YouTube is a copyvio and a no-reliable source.
Spellcast, is this enough for you to block his editing? For Pete's sake!.--Tasc0 07:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
He said he would stop changing it if he saw the cover. Tasc0, would you be able to upload the cover temporarily? Don't worry about copyright paranoia. This is just to settle the content dispute. Spellcast (talk) 08:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why should I check if you're not going to check? And how are they "copy videos" if the members of Nationwide and Damu are in them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.212.153 (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not going to check nothing because I have the most reliable source: the back cover. And the videos are copyvios because are not published by its copyright holder.
And...no, Spellcast. That violates Wikipedia policies and I won't upload it here. Specially when I release my contributions under GFDL.
Like I said, if you want to see it, just send me an e-mail. You can reach it on my user page. Otherwise, seeing you won't take action to this vandal, Spellcast, I'll end reporting it to the Noticebord. Thank you.--Tasc0 00:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
personal attack removed
There was a chance we could have come to an agreement. But comments like this tells me the IP is not taking this as seriously as I thought. Tasco has given the most reliable source available - the actual album, which takes precedence over the music video. I've semi-protected this for two weeks. If anyone has a more reliable source than the album, feel free to add it here. Spellcast (talk) 02:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply