Talk:National University of Modern Languages
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National University of Modern Languages article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Full protection edit
The edit warring on this page was unacceptable. Please discuss the issue below and I will unprotect the article when consensus is reached. Please note that this protection does not endorse the current version of the page. J Milburn (talk) 22:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Jpshorne can you explain your repeated re-insertion of in-appropriate content? Δ (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Δ can you explain how 9+kb of so-called "redlinked files an cruft" were allowed to accumulate between 6 February and 25 June, and stick around until your first challenge of them in this edit 03:58, 12 July 2010, and why you went on to revert reversion of your deletion seven times over the following 18 hours? — Jeff G. ツ 00:13, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Quite easily, there where at the time of my first edit 9 images being used on this page. Of those 9 images all but one had been deleted. Given Jpshorne's edits and his use of IPs that trace back to Pakistan, it would lead me to believe that there is a conflict of interest involved and that he probably works for the university. This type of material is easily added to articles that dont have many people actively monitoring it. I have seen pages sit for months with obvious spam in them, (they use very biased phrases and words like our). So just because something slipped though the cracks does not mean it should have. ΔT The only constant 00:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Δ can you explain how 9+kb of so-called "redlinked files an cruft" were allowed to accumulate between 6 February and 25 June, and stick around until your first challenge of them in this edit 03:58, 12 July 2010, and why you went on to revert reversion of your deletion seven times over the following 18 hours? — Jeff G. ツ 00:13, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National University of Modern Languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113082754/http://www.hec.gov.pk/InsideHEC/Divisions/QALI/Others/RankingofUniversities/Pages/CategoryWise.aspx to http://www.hec.gov.pk/INSIDEHEC/DIVISIONS/QALI/OTHERS/RANKINGOFUNIVERSITIES/Pages/CategoryWise.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)