Talk:National Trust for Scotland
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Trust for Scotland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Request to Update
editHello all,
I'm currently volunteering with the National Trust for Scotland, and I'd like to put some more information on this page, aiming to get it up to about the length and quality of National_Trust_for_Places_of_Historic_Interest_or_Natural_Beauty. While I genuinely don't want to put anything biased on here, I understand I may end up writing something that's unconsciously so due to my position. As such I'd like to declare possible conflict of interest and that I am aware of WP:SCOIC. Cheers, and let me know if I have the go ahead to make any changes. --Vegetable bounce (talk) 09:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is the "encyclopedia that anyone can edit". You don't need a go-ahead from anyone. As long as you draw on reliable sources and be objective there should not be a problem. Happy editing, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
In Trust for Scotland
editCriticism of NTS's management of the assets in its care has been given voice by a members' group In Trust For Scotland (ITFS)[1]. Spurred on by a round of redundancies and property closures in Spring 2009, ITFS is campaigning for an Extraordinary General Meeting of members to force the Trust to discuss the business case and future strategy Farci1 (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
- Please feel free to add anything relevant to the article, bearing in mind Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on National Trust for Scotland. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nts.org.uk/About/The-Review
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)