Talk:National Supervisory Commission

Latest comment: 3 years ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 8 October 2020

Requested move 8 October 2020 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply



National Supervisory CommissionNational Commission of Supervision – This is the name stated in their constitution [1] [2] Mike Rohsopht (talk) 06:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC) Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 21:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom. – DarkGlow (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose while it may be the official name, it looks like more sources use the current name. Usually we go with the common name rather than WP:OFFICIALNAME. (t · c) buidhe 21:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose I do not know Chinese, but there exists high possibility that all translations used in sources (I have also seen form National Supervision Commission) are grammaticaly correct. Therefore, usage of the form: "National Supervisory Commission", as the widest-spread one, in the title, as well as in the rest of the article, is definitely unquestionable. Deditus Particulo Write to me 22:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.