This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
National Scout and Guide Symphony Orchestra is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have removed a personal account by Georgeodam regarding the founding of the Orchestra. I did this because it is essentially content that cannot be verified elsewhere. Wikipedia is not a place to publish original content. It is an encyclopedia, that means it contains content that has already been published in other reliable sources first. Perhaps the orchestra has a publication itself that would be best suited for this? --Escape Orbit(Talk) 16:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I endorse your action, but there may be a source that covers what User:Georgeodam wrote. He may for example have published it in a magazine. If not he should be encouraged to do so, but someone else should add the content to this article in their own words. --Bduke(Discussion) 22:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
