edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on National Library of China. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Library of China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Largest library in Asia ?

edit

Je ne vois pas trop comment elle peut être la plus grande bibliothèque en Asie si elle est apparemment plus petite que la National Diet Library37.173.9.226 (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

How large ist the number of medieval manuscripts?

edit

From 500-1500? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CB:2F1F:3026:C4F0:2B65:E9E9:4517 (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Largest library in Asia

edit

How is this the largest library in Asia? The infobox states it contains 37 million items, while the article on the National Diet Library in Japan state it contains more than 41 million items. The official website of the NDL gives a figure of 43.4 million items for 2017. This page states the NLC contained 37.6 million items in 2017. I don't know if there are more current numbers available, but at least in 2017 the NDL collection was larger than the NLC collection, so I question the validity of the statement in the lead section of this article stating the NLC is the largest library in Asia. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

I changed the statement accordingly. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply