Talk:National Heads-Up Poker Championship
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Brackets
editNot that I don't like the bracket view, but it is going to make this article huge. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 14:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:NBCHeadUp.jpg
editImage:NBCHeadUp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Flipament
editthe structure of the tourney with its very fast blinds doesn't really allow for skill in play. might not be interesting to lay person watching but i think it is important to include
- Why? It's really not that notable. --ECWAGuru (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Results
editIs it honestly necessary to have both the tournament brackets and the expanded results immediately afterwards? It just seems redundant to me (not to mention it makes the page difficult to look at). --ECWAGuru (talk) 20:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- True. One of them should go. -Koppapa (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- IMO, the brackets are far nicer-looking. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)