Article seems to be written as an advertisement although perhaps if it weren’t for the person who wrote it with that motive we’d have nothing here.

edit

I think there’s a lot that should be deleted in this article. For instance the whole thing on other similar publications, where it says that the handbook is a great book for today’s professional, and then where it mentions that the publishers of the NESC also offer classes on how to follow the NESC really seems to be more of a commercial advertisement than anything else. I think some of this should be stricken and better content provided PaupaZit (talk) 03:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Probably. There's a lot that should be included like the different editions, publication cycle, who has adopted what, and if anyone was so bold as to write out summary changes it would've been a huge boon for this poor project engineer. 172.86.40.10 (talk) 17:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply