Talk:National Changhua Senior High School

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Promotion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I am opening a thread here to allow for discussion on the apparent desire for some editors to characterise the subject here as "one of the most outstanding high schools in Taiwan nowadays". Or "one of the top schools in Changhua County". Or "one of the most prestigious and distinguished high schools in Middle Taiwan". I have removed several of these claims in recent weeks. As each was problematic under WP:SYNTH, WP:PROMO, WP:PUFFERY and WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV guidelines. If there is an academic report or a news report or a similar (verifiable and reliable) source which can support a claim of the school having the "best results in the county", or "highest number of students placed in university", or a similar OBJECTIVE claim, then please provide them. In short, if adding:

An objective fact, then present it as such. And provide a reference: "According to ABC report, the school had the highest average exam scores in 2018 [REF1]"
A subjective opinion, then present it as such. And provide an attribution. "According to XYZ analyst, the school had the highest name recognition in 2017 [REF2]".

Adding unattributed opinions (as if they were an objective fact), and adding unsupported claims (as if they were objectively verifiable) is not appropriate under a half-dozen project guidelines. Please stop doing it. Guliolopez (talk) 13:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic