This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles
Natalie Lowe is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've noticed these popping up across several articles on Strictly pros, and so I'll voice my objections here. Adding things like average scores and highest and lowest scoring dances is trivial. The show itself does not provide average scores consistently. This is the sort of thing more fitting for a fan page than an encyclopedia. The more math based trivia we have, the more arguments there tend to be with different editors insisting that the numbers are off. These things are already covered in excruciating detail on the pages for each series. These articles should be written in prose, not a collection of stats. I'm removing it for now. Knope7 (talk) 02:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
