This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It seems a lot of the sources used on this article are not reliable sources (by Wikipedia standards). I recommend reading the WP:RELIABLE guideline, specifically the section WP:REPUTABLE. It says that articles should be primarily based on "independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." "Independent" means that the majority of sources used should not be connected to the subject being discussed, and "reputation for fact-checking" usually means the source should be known to have some sort of editing or fact-checking process.
At the moment, none of the current sources used are WP:INDEPENDENT - The first five sources are places she has worked (not independent), and the last two seem to be self-published, primary sources. The article should at least have one independent, secondary source. For now, I'll tag the article accordingly. - Whisperjanes (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
