Talk:Natacha Merritt

Notability

Having had a book published is not enough for notability. Rhomb (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Natacha-Merrittsexy thoughts.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Natacha-Merrittsexy thoughts.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Natacha-Merrittsexy thoughts.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Multiple Issues tag added. Comment

First up, the subject does seem to me to meet notability criteria. Perhaps only just, but enough; so I'm not advocating deletion.

Parts of the article read like a promo for the subject. I note that one of the editors in article History used the subject's name in creating the user account. Make of that what you will. Significant re-wording for WP:NPoV would be good.

Some of the references are fine, others look like rubbish to me. Point is, there's not enough good ones.

I'll try to get back later and do some copy-editing. Wayne 12:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

This does not seem to meet criteria for notability, and tone is entirely promo. Also, not only did one of the editors use subject’s name, another used subject’s partner’s name. 2603:8000:1400:5BF3:5FE:F68D:D389:4A25 (talk) 00:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Natacha Merritt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111220007/http://www.bongout.org/ to http://www.bongout.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)