Talk:Nass (Islam)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Sam Sailor in topic Wikipedia:No original research
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I have in this edit reverted to a previous version to rid the article of a massive amount of unsourced text. Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. I especially notice that it is claimed that Christianity and Jewism (a disparaging word for Judaism) should be a result of nass. Very hard to think that any Islamic scholar should have applied the concept of nass here. It gets outright idiotic when the bulleted list has Hebrewism mentioned. Per WP:BURDEN any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be replaced without an inline citation to a reliable source. Best, Sam Sailor Sing 15:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)