Talk:Nancy Pearl
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lesbian??
editIs Ms Pearl a lesbian? -- Jmabel | Talk 07:42, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.240.200.7 (talk)
Tribute band??
editDoes anyone have a verifiable source on that tribute band thing? If it's true, I think it is very cool, but unsourced and added anonymously, I've got my doubts. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:42, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
It is certainly true, although verification could prove embarrassing for the participants. (anonymously posted)
- Hmm. Like was there any show poster, or coverage anywhere? I'm asking because this is the kind of thing that is sheer hell for someone to document afterwards when fact-checking an article. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:06, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
- when I did the most recent update I was seriously considering getting rid of that. it's a cute little side note but with no verification and not even some more source material, it rings very un-encyclopedic. -- Jessamyn
tribute band
editWould a photograph be enough verification, do you think?
- sure, or a flyer or something. it's getting a little silly though and changing the text to read that the show was "quite an experience" is verging on lacking NPOV for something that lacks any media coverage at all. I'm sure it was delightful, and yet it's very very tangentially relevant to the subject in the first place. Got a picture? show it off. Jessamyn 03:25, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Citations
editI cited for the obvious here, but (among other things) her early life and her daughters' names need citation. - Jmabel | Talk 00:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Nancy Pearl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061117085731/http://booklust.wetpaint.com/ to http://www.booklust.wetpaint.com/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://interviews.lisnews.org/article.pl?sid=05%2F08%2F08%2F1918226 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208081947/http://www.habitsofwaste.wwu.edu/issues/7/iss7art3b.shtml to http://www.habitsofwaste.wwu.edu/issues/7/iss7art3b.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)