Talk:Nanchang Q-5

Untitled

From the article: "Plans for an upgraded Q-5/A-5 with Western equipment and new navigation and attack (nav/attack) systems were largely aborted following the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, but the aircraft continues in service." What is the link between the Tiananmen Square protests and not upgrading a jet fighter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.71.21 (talk) 07:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Tech ban prevents western equipment from going to China. Same story with Super-7. That doesn't mean there's no domestic upgrades tho. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.131.140 (talk) 07:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

ASM carrier questioned

according to Chinese source,the 317A radar was never produced in any number except those for experiment,also there was never source in China to veify this carrier. http://www.zgjunshi.com/Article/Class38/Class78/Class86/200410/20041019144523.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.57.104.172 (talk) 12:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nanchang Q-5/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

"This article needs copy editing for spelling, grammar, usage, tone, style, and voice." has been appended to the page. Also needs references; the variants section could perhaps be moved to a page of its own. This article has a fair bit of text, and most of it is relevant information. Currently contains: standard infobox, footer, and specs.

Last edited at 01:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nanchang Q-5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100116100259/http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/groundattack/q5.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/groundattack/q5.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110226111211/http://www.airforceworld.com/pla/q-5-a-5-striker-china.htm to http://airforceworld.com/pla/q-5-a-5-striker-china.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)