Talk:Names of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Pashtun

	Names of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is part of WikiProject Pashtun, a project to maintain and expand Pashtun-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.PashtunWikipedia:WikiProject PashtunTemplate:WikiProject PashtunPashtun articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Pakistan

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merger with Pashtunistan edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Why are these two separate articles, as they really relate to a common theme. Though, I guess Pakhtunkhwa really relates more to a naming converntion within Pakistan?? May just be easier to incorporate the info into one page, and avoid duplication. Nlsanand (talk) 00:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

The article topic is fundamentally different from Pashtunistan and is too long to be merged and still maintain the integrity of the NWFP/Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa article so I've reworked it slightly and am moving it to Names of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa per WP:BOLD. — AjaxSmack 22:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agree - this article is better as independent. Mar4d (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Or rename? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Yes it relates to a naming convention within Pakistan. If NWFP gets renamed Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakhtunkhwa should probably redirect there. (See also Talk:North-West Frontier Province#Requested move). In that case, maybe this article should become Names of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. This article could include much of the info on the naming dispute that is in the article now plus a little on the other names mentioned (Khyber, Afghania, Abasin, Nuristan, &c.) — AjaxSmack 04:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am moving it per WP:BOLD. — AjaxSmack 22:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Complex title raises questions edit

Latest comment: 4 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am uncertain about this article. It might be more logical to integrate it into a chapter of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The current title seems overly complex and might hinder its discoverability. Any idea @Saqib? Crosji (talk) 05:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sometimes, it's wise to seek out a 3rd opinion so pinging @SheriffIsInTown: —Saqib (talk I contribs) 06:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic