Talk:Namdaemun Market

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

I think there was definitely a need for this page to be made. There are about 40 pages already linking to it. It should probably be in more categories, and it is missing a whole lot of information, but it is a start. Isaac Crumm 08:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Need References edit

There needs to be citations and references. This Namdaemun Market page claims it is the largest "market" in Seoul and the COEX Mall page claims it is the largest "shopping center" in Seoul. What does that mean? What about largest in Korea?

Yes, there should be some references. However, the two above statements are not contradictor- by "market" it is referencing a "traditional" Korean market, and the COEX Mall is talking about a modern mall. Isaac Crumm 04:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

What happened to all the pictures?Isaac Crumm 02:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images edit

Wikipedia is not a repository of images - we have Wikimedia Commons for that. For technical, bandwidth reasons, there is no need to post every available image onto an article. Images which clearly identify NM, great, images which could have been taken at any Asian market, not necessary. Deiz talk 02:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Namdaemun Market. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply